Opportunity Information
Funding Information
Award Information
Submission Information
Question Submission Information
Eligibility Information
Additional Information
Award Administration Information
Criteria
The following criteria will be used by the Department for evaluating and ranking grant applications. Each criterion indicates the weighting that will be given to that criterion.
- Project Need (20%)
- Trail significance − the estimated users that will be attracted to the trail/trail site; will it have potential for interstate, State, regional or local importance
- Geographic distribution – will the proposed project, considering the trail type and proposed users of the trail or site, be the first in the county, area, or region
- Population served
- Project concept and quality (55%)
- Project type
- acquisition of land for new trails/trail sites
- initial development of trails/trail sites
- additional development of existing trails/trail sites
- renovation of existing trails/trail facilities
- Trail length
- Diversity of trail use
- Scenic quality of the trail corridor or the trail site
- Availability of necessary amenities/support facilities, such as drinking water, restrooms, and parking
- Project sponsor maintenance capabilities and projects having the most long-term, stable management potential
- Project type
- Environmental suitability of the proposed trail/trail site (5%)
- Local support for the proposed project (5%)
- Local financial contribution (5%)
- Overall program suitability (5%)
- Applicant/Application Factors (5%)
- Consideration is given to the applicant's past performance in completing Department grant projects or unresolved project violations, maintenance history of existing sites, and administrative considerations (such as application completeness and response time during the application process).
Review and Selection Process
The Department will review, evaluate and prioritize the applications utilizing the criteria listed above. Awarding of grants is on a competitive basis and made under authority and directive of the Director of the Department of Natural Resources. In arriving at a final determination, the Director will consider the recommendations of Department staff, Department of Natural Resources Advisory Board Members and the criteria listed above.
The Director of the Department of Natural Resources, with staff, reviews and prioritizes project applications according to the established program rating criteria. The Director makes final decisions concerning RTP grant awards. Once a decision has been reached, awarded projects will be announced.
Merit-Based Review Appeals Process
In compliance with GATA, applicants have the right to appeal the evaluation process but not the evaluation score. More information is available at: http://ilga.gov/commission/JCAR/admincode/044/044070000D03500R.html