Opportunity Information
Funding Information
Award Information
Submission Information
Eligibility Information
Additional Information
Award Administration Information
Criteria
All Section 319(h) applications shall be reviewed for completeness, technical merit, cost effectiveness, and adherence to the Clean Water Act, U.S. EPA Section 319(h) program guidance, and the competitive grant evaluation criteria described in this NOFO. Applications found to be complete shall undergo a comprehensive, merit-based review performed in compliance with GATA Legislation, 30 ILCS 708 and Uniform Administrative Requirements, 2 C.F.R. § 200. The merit-based review is designed to evaluate the applications against the following criteria:
Tier 1
General Quality of Application (0 – 10 points)
- All required components are submitted and complete
- Project information submitted is sufficient for evaluation, consistent, and correct
Quality of Proposal (0 – 20 points)
- Project is consistent with the intent of the NOFO
- The application identifies steps to implement the Project and provides clear Project goals and measurable objectives needed to achieve the expected outputs and outcomes
- Timeline is appropriate for the tasks and milestones outlined
- Project can be completed in two (2) years or less
- Budget line items are justified in the Project narrative
- Proposed approach/actions/activities are appropriate or technically/scientifically sound for NPS pollution control in critical areas identified in the WBP or TMDL Implementation Plan
- The application documents the proposed pollutant load reductions (sediment, nitrogen, phosphorus) including the percent reduction of the Illinois EPA approved WBP or TMDL Implementation Plan Load Reduction recommendations
Anticipated Outputs and Outcomes (0 – 20 points)
- Project will help improve capacity of local, State, and/or federal partners to control NPS pollution
- Project will protect critical area(s) identified in an Illinois EPA-approved WBP or TMDL Implementation Plan
- Project proposes to implement components of an Illinois EPA WBP or TMDL Implementation Plan
- Project component designed lifespan is 10 years or greater
- Project includes design, implementation, and monitoring to show measurable environmental results
- Project includes a long-term operation and maintenance (O&M) plan, including identification of responsible parties and funds to implement the O&M after grant is complete
Cost Effectiveness (0 – 10 points)
- Budget is detailed and clearly presented
- Project costs are limited to eligible components and activities
- Project’s components and/or activities are cost-effective and/or comparable to other NPS pollution control projects
Addresses Need and Environmental Significance (0 – 20 points)
- The Project is a NPS component of an Illinois EPA-approved WBP or TMDL Implementation Plan
- Project will prevent or control NPS pollution that currently impacts the water quality of an Illinois river, stream, lake, or groundwater resource
- Proposed approach/actions/activities are appropriate or technically/scientifically sound for NPS pollution control
Financial Integrity (0 – 10 points)
- Applicant has the financial ability to complete the project
Programmatic Capability, Technical Experience and Qualifications (0 – 10 points)
- Applicant, or its consultant(s) or partner(s), can successfully manage and complete the Project
- Applicant, or its consultant(s) or partner(s), has strong staff expertise/qualifications, staff knowledge, and resources or the ability to obtain them, to successfully achieve the intent of the NOFO
Minimum Cut Score. Application points for the Tier 1 criterion listed above will be summed to arrive at a preliminary composite average score. A total of 100 points is possible. A minimum cut score of 70 will be used to determine if points for the additional Tier 2 criterion listed below will be applied. Applications that score ≤69 will not be given any additional Tier 2 points for the criterion listed below.
Tier 2
Relationship to an approved WBP. (Point Range 0, 5, or 10) Priority will be given to those projects that implement an Illinois-EPA approved WBP. NPS pollution control projects that are identified as being within an approved WBP that eliminate impairments and\or restore impaired waters will receive higher consideration than Projects submitted without the support of such a plan. Implementation of a WBP to address NPS pollution could include design and installation of BMPs that have been identified for specific critical areas; NPS water quality modeling, environmental and social indicator monitoring, and outreach activities that are specifically identified in the WBP. Applications where the eligible project have no relationship to and are not located within a Watershed Plan will earn 0 points. Eligible projects located within a Watershed Plan will earn 10 points.
Relationship to an approved TMDL. (Point Range 0, 5, or 10) Priority will be given to those projects that address nonpoint source pollution and are located within a U.S. EPA-approved TMDL. A TMDL is the maximum amount of a specific pollutant loading a waterbody can tolerate and still support all its intended uses. Applications where an approved TMDL watershed addressing nonpoint source pollution makes up between 21% and 70% of the Project planning area will earn 5 points. Applications where the TMDL watershed area addressing nonpoint source pollution makes up between 71% and 100% of the Project planning area will earn 10 points.
Click here for additional information about Illinois EPA’s TMDL Program and consult with the Planning Unit at (217) 782-3362 before applying for the implementation of a TMDL implementation plan.
Relationship to Illinois EPA Priority Watersheds. (Point Range 0, 5, or 10) Priority will be given to those projects that are located within Illinois EPA Priority Watersheds for NPS pollution control implementation, as applicable. Illinois has 51 basins; all 51 basins will be a priority for watershed-based planning and plan implementation at least once every five years. Each year, a subset (8 – 11) of the basins will be a priority for planning. Two-years later those same basins will be a priority for plan implementation. Waterbody segments, except for main-stem waters, that are not attaining their designated water quality uses due to NPS pollution impairments are the priority waterbodies within the priority watersheds. The main-stem waterbodies have greater priority once NPS components of a WBP for their headwater areas have been developed and implemented. The 10 to 12-digit hydrologic units (HUC) that contain these impaired waterbody segments are the priority watershed. A higher priority for assistance will be given to those watersheds that have multiple NPS impaired waterbody segments. Priority will also be given to those projects that are located within a NPS Priority Watershed to Reduce Nutrient Loss. Click here to see a set of maps that depict the 5-year planning and implementation priority watershed rotation and the priority watersheds for nutrient reduction. Applications that have no relationship to and are not located within a Priority Watershed or where a Priority Watershed area makes up less than 20% of the Project planning area will earn 0 points. Applications where a Priority Watershed area makes up between 21% and 70% of the Project planning area will earn 5 points. Eligible projects where the Priority Watershed area makes up between 71% and 100% of the Project planning area will earn 10 points.
Relationship to Illinois EPA Environmental Justice Areas (Point Range 0, 5, or 10) Priority will be given to those projects that are located within an Illinois EPA Environmental Justice Area. "Environmental Justice" is based on the principle that all people should be protected from environmental pollution and have the right to a clean and healthy environment. Environmental justice is the protection of the health of the people of Illinois and its environment, equity in the administration of the State's environmental programs, and the provision of adequate opportunities for meaningful involvement of all people with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. Applications that have no relationship to and are not located earn 0 points. Applications where the Environmental justice area makes up less than 50% of the Project planning area will earn 5 points. Applications where the Priority Watershed area makes up more than 50% of the Project planning area will earn 10 points.
Review and Selection Process
The complete applications shall be reviewed by an Evaluation Panel that is composed of Illinois EPA, Bureau of Water (BOW), Watershed Management Section (WMS), NPS Unit staff and other BOW staff, as available.
If fewer than 50 applications are received, each application shall be reviewed in-depth by the entire Evaluation Panel. If 50 or more applications are received, at least two Evaluation Panel members shall review each application in-depth, and the remaining Evaluation Panel members shall attend a group presentation summarizing the application. During years when more than 50 applications are received, additional quality control on the review process will be made to ensure accurate and consistent scoring.
Illinois EPA’s NPS Unit shall solicit peer reviews on the applications from:
- within the Illinois EPA regional offices in which the Project is located; and
- the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Illinois Department of Agriculture, and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
The peer reviews shall not generate a numerical score but will provide information for the Evaluation Panel to consider while conducting the merit-based review.
The Evaluation Panel shall be convened to discuss the applications, peer review comments, and other relevant information. Using the merit-based review criteria, using either a full in-depth review (for < 50 applications received) or the group summarization (≥50 applications received) each member of the Evaluation Panel shall individually score each application on a scale of 100 points independently of the whole panel. Each Evaluation Panel member shall then give the application a numeric score. These individual scores shall be shared with the whole Evaluation Panel. Any significant or substantial variance between member’s scores shall be reviewed and documented, including voluntary revision of individual scores.
Application points for the Tier 2 criterion will be added to the eligible applications to arrive at a preliminary composite average score. The final individual scores shall be converted into a composite average score for each application and ranked accordingly. Section 319(h) Grant Program funds will be awarded per the NOFO, starting with the highest ranked project funded first, followed in order by rank and eligibility.
Additional review and selection processes are provided below.
- Illinois EPA will remove ineligible Project components and corresponding costs and rank the Project using the remaining cost (total, grant award, and match) to determine final project rank.
- If the amount of available grant funding is not sufficient to fund the application in its entirety, the Evaluation Panel shall review the application to determine if a discrete portion or phase of the project meeting the mission of this NOFO can be funded.
- If the Evaluation Panel determines that an applicant incorrectly calculated or indicated the project cost, match, and/or total funding request based on the applicable cost estimate, required match, or eligible costs, the application shall still be accepted and reviewed. If the applicant is awarded the grant, the Illinois EPA shall contact the applicant and request a decision from the applicant as to whether it will accept the award based on the Illinois EPA’s determination of the project cost, applicant match, and/or total funding requested. If the applicant does not accept the Illinois EPA’s determination, the application shall not be funded.
Illinois EPA’s NPS Unit shall present a summary of all the applications received to the Chief of the Bureau of Water and the Director of the Illinois EPA. This summary shall include confirmation that the NOFO was followed and the findings and recommendations of the Evaluation Panel, including application rank and funding recommendation.
Based on eligibility and merit criteria, and the Evaluation Panel scoring, the Illinois’ Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Work Plan (Work Plan) Project List will be prepared and submitted to U.S. EPA for approval. The Project List identifies the selected applications (Projects) proposed for funding by Illinois EPA. with a budget spreadsheet, a short narrative summary of each Project, and a copy of the selected Project applications.
U.S. EPA should issue comments to the Illinois EPA on the detailed Work Plan following a review period. Illinois EPA will then respond to U.S. EPA’s comments to answer concerns and questions.
Illinois EPA expects to send written notice to each applicant whose Project was not included in the Work Plan informing them that their application was not selected for funding.
Following a decision of intent to award, the Illinois EPA is required by GATA to conduct a programmatic risk assessment of the applicant. Additional information may be required at that time from the successful applicant. To remain eligible for the award, the applicant must provide the requested information within the time specified by the Illinois EPA. The Programmatic Risk Assessment evaluates the applicant’s ability to successfully carry out the terms of the Section 319(h) Grant Program and assesses four risk categories: 1) quality of management systems and ability to meet the management standards; 2) history of performance; 3) reports and findings from audits performed on prior awards; and 4) the applicant’s ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other requirements imposed on a Grantee.
Appeal Process
An appeal process is available to applicants and other interested parties; however, appeals are limited to the Illinois EPA evaluation process. Evaluation scores may not be protested. An appeal must be submitted in writing to the following address: Illinois EPA, Attn: Section 319(h) Grant Program, Bureau of Water, 1021 N. Grand Avenue, Mail Code #15, P.O. Box 19276, Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276 and must be received within 14 calendar days after the date that the grant award notice has been published by the Illinois EPA on Grants.Illinois.gov. The written appeal shall include at a minimum the following: the name and address of the appealing party, identification of the grant, and a statement of reasons for the appeal. Illinois EPA shall acknowledge receipt of an appeal within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date the appeal was received.
When an appeal is received, the execution of the grant agreement that Illinois EPA intends to make under this NOFO shall be stayed until the appeal is resolved.
Illinois EPA shall respond to the appeal within 60 days or supply a written explanation to the appealing party as to why additional time is required. The appealing party must supply any additional information requested by Illinois EPA within the time period set in the request. The Director of the Illinois EPA may appoint one or more Appeal Review Officers (ARO) to consider the grant-related appeal and make a recommendation to the Director of the Illinois EPA or designee for resolution. The ARO shall make a recommendation to the Director of the Illinois EPA or designee as expeditiously as possible after receiving all relevant, requested information. In determining the appropriate recommendation, the ARO shall consider the integrity of the competitive grant process and the impact of the recommendation on the Illinois EPA. The Illinois EPA shall resolve the appeal by means of written determination, which shall include, but not be limited to: review of the appeal, appeal determination, and rationale for the determination.
Anticipated Announcement Dates
By September 1, 2024, Illinois EPA expects to send written notice to each applicant whose application was not selected for inclusion in the Section 319 Grant Program Work Plan.
By November 1, 2024, the Illinois EPA expects to notify successful grant applicants of the funding terms and specific conditions resulting from the pre-award risk assessments.
By January 15, 2025, Illinois EPA expects to send a grant agreement to the grant recipient for signature.
By March 1, 2025, Illinois EPA expects to provide a fully executed grant agreement to the grant recipient. A fully executed grant agreement is authorization for the grant recipient to begin work on the project.
| Action by Illinois EPA | Target Dates |
| Notify unsuccessful applicants that their application was not selected for inclusion in the Section 319(h) Grant Program Work Plan. | September 1, 2024 |
| Notify applicant of successful grant award. | November 1, 2024 |
| Send a Grant Agreement to the selected applicant for signature. | January 15, 2025 |
| Provide a fully executed Grant Agreement to the grantee. | March 1, 2025 |
The anticipated start date for approved projects is March 1, 2025.