Opportunity Information
Funding Information
Award Information
Submission Information
Technical Assistance Session
Eligibility Information
Award Administration Information
Criteria
All Section 604(b) Grant Program applications shall be reviewed for completeness, technical merit, cost effectiveness, and adherence to the Clean Water Act, U.S. EPA Section 604(b) program guidance, and the competitive grant evaluation criteria described in this NOFO. Applications found to be complete shall undergo a comprehensive, merit-based review performed in compliance with GATA Legislation 30 ILCS 708 and Uniform Administrative Requirements; 2 CFR § 200. The merit-based review is designed to evaluate applications against the following criteria:
Tier 1
General Quality of Application (1 – 10 points)
- All questions have been adequately or appropriately answered
- Level of completeness and attention to detail
- Application includes clear project description, tasks, and measurable outcomes
- Project description is easy to understand
Quality of Proposal (1 – 20 points)
- Project is consistent with the intent of the NOFO
- Applicant is either a Regional Public Comprehensive Planning Organization (RPCPO) or has a State recognized Charter that specifically includes the type of work proposed in the Section 604(b) Grant Program application
- The application identifies steps to implement the Project and provides clear Project goals and measurable objectives needed to achieve the expected outputs and outcomes
- The level of Project development is strong
- Timeline is appropriate for the tasks and milestones outlined
- Project can be completed in two (2) years or less
- Budget line items are justified in the Project narrative
Anticipated Outputs and Outcomes (1 – 20 points)
- The application identifies clear Project goals and measurable objectives
- The application demonstrates a sound plan for measuring progress toward achieving the expected outputs and outcomes
- Project helps improve capacity of local, State, and/or federal partners to control water pollution
- For watershed-based plan (WBP) development projects,
- The application outlines a comprehensive strategy to meet USEPA's 9 WBP key elements
- The application demonstrates a thorough plan to inventory watershed resources
- The application includes an inclusive plan for the incorporation of public participation into the planning process
- For non-watershed-based plan development projects
- The Project proposes to implement components of an Illinois EPA WBP or Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan
- Project addresses critical area(s) identified in an Illinois EPA-approved WBP or TMDL Implementation Plan
- Project utilizes outcome-based approaches to meet design, information and education, and/or technical assistance goals
Cost Effectiveness (1 – 10 points)
- Budget is detailed and clearly presented
- Project costs are limited to eligible components and activities
- Project components and/or activities are cost-effective and/or comparable to other water quality management projects
Addresses Need and Environmental Significance (1 – 20 points)
- Project will support activities to ensure protection or improvement of water quality in Illinois' surface water resources
- Proposed approach/actions/activities are appropriate or technically/scientifically sound to control point and/or NPS pollution
- The Project is a component of a larger water quality improvement project or program
Financial Integrity (1 – 10 points)
- Applicant has the financial ability to complete the Project
Programmatic Capability, Technical Experience and Qualifications (1 – 10 points)
- Applicant, or its consultant or partner, can successfully manage and complete the Project
- Applicant, or its consultant or partner, has strong staff expertise/qualifications, staff knowledge, and resources or the ability to obtain them, to successfully achieve the intent of the NOFO
Minimum Cut Score. Application points for the Tier 1 criterion listed above will be summed to arrive at a preliminary composite average score. A minimum cut score of 70 will be used to determine if points for the additional Tier 2 criterion listed below will be applied. Applications that score ≤69 will not be given any additional Tier 2 points for the criterion listed below, regardless if they apply.
Tier 2
Relationship to an approved WBP. (Point Range 0, 5, or 10) Priority will be given to those projects that support implementation of an Illinois-EPA approved WBP. Implementation of a WBP could include design of BMPs that have been identified for specific critical areas; Water quality modeling; environmental and social indicator monitoring; and outreach activities that are specifically identified in the WBP. Applications that have no relationship and are not located within an approved WBP earn 0 points, while those with eligible projects partially located in an Illinois-approved WBP earn 5 points. Those Projects that have eligible projects which are entirely located within an approved WBP earn 10 points.
Relationship to an approved TMDL. (Point Range 0, 5, or 10) Priority will be given to those projects that support implementation of a U.S. EPA-approved TMDL. Implementation of a TMDL could include design of BMPs that have been identified for specific critical areas; Water quality modeling; environmental and social indicator monitoring; and outreach activities that are specifically identified in the TMDL. Projects that have no relationship to and are not located within an approved TMDL earn 0 points, while those with eligible projects in areas that are partially located within an approved TMDL will earn 5 points. Those with eligible projects that are entirely located within an approved TMDL earn 10 points.
Click here for additional information about Illinois EPA’s TMDL Program and consult with the Planning Unit at (217) 782-3362 before applying for the implementation of a TMDL Implementation Plan.
Relationship to Illinois EPA Environmental Justice Areas (Point Range 0, 5, or 10) Priority will be given to those projects that are located within an Illinois EPA Environmental Justice Area. "Environmental Justice" is based on the principle that all people should be protected from environmental pollution and have the right to a clean and healthy environment. Environmental justice is the protection of the health of the people of Illinois and its environment, equity in the administration of the State's environmental programs, and the provision of adequate opportunities for meaningful involvement of all people with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. Projects that have no relationship to an Environmental Justice Area will earn 0 points, while those with project areas that are partially located in an Environmental Justice Area earn 5 points. Those projects that are entirely located within an Environmental Justice Area(s) earn 10 points.
Review and Selection Process
The complete applications shall be reviewed by an Evaluation Panel that is composed of Illinois EPA, Bureau of Water (BOW), Watershed Management Section (WMS) staff, and other BOW staff, as available.
Each application shall be reviewed in-depth by the entire Evaluation Panel.
Illinois EPA’s WMS shall solicit peer reviews on the applications from within the Illinois EPA regional offices in which the project is located.
The peer reviews shall not generate a numerical score but will provide information for the Evaluation Panel to consider while conducting the merit-based review.
The Evaluation Panel shall be convened to discuss the applications, peer review comments, and other relevant information. Using the merit-based review criteria, each member of the Evaluation Panel shall individually score each application on a scale of 100 points independently of the whole panel. Each Evaluation Panel member shall then give the application a numeric score. These individual scores shall be shared with the whole Evaluation Panel and recorded on a summary score sheet that shows the comparative scores. Any significant or substantial variance between member’s scores shall be reviewed and documented, including voluntary revision of individual scores.
Application points for the Tier 2 criterion will be added to the eligible applications (applications that received a Tier I score of 70 or above) to arrive at a composite score. The final scores shall be ranked accordingly. Section 604(b) Grant Program funds will be awarded per the NOFO, starting with the highest ranked project funded first, followed in order by rank and eligibility.
Additional review and selection processes are provided below.
- If the amount of available grant funding is not sufficient to fund the application in its entirety, the Evaluation Panel shall review the application to determine if a discrete portion or phase of the project meeting the mission of this NOFO can be funded.
- If the Evaluation Panel determines that an applicant incorrectly calculated or indicated the project cost and/or total funding request based on the applicable cost estimate or eligible costs, the application shall still be accepted and reviewed. If the application is recommended for funding, the Illinois EPA shall contact the applicant and request a decision from the applicant as to whether it will accept the award based on the Illinois EPA’s determination of the Project cost and/or total funding requested. If the applicant does not accept the Illinois EPA’s determination, the application shall not be funded.
Illinois EPA’s Watershed Management Section will present a summary of all the applications to the Chief of the Bureau of Water and to the Director of the Illinois EPA. This summary shall include confirmation that the NOFO was followed and the findings and recommendations of the Evaluation Panel, including application rank and funding recommendation.
Based on USEPA program guidelines, and the Evaluation Panel’s scoring, the Illinois’ Section 604(b) Grant Program Water Quality Management Work Plan (Work Plan) will be prepared and submitted to US EPA for approval. The Work Plan identifies the selected applications (projects) proposed for funding by Illinois EPA. If the amount of available grant funding is not anticipated to be sufficient to fund a higher-ranked application in its entirety and the applicant declines the offer of partial funding, the Illinois EPA will select for inclusion in the Work Plan the next highest-ranked application that Illinois EPA would anticipate to be able to fund based on the grant funding level anticipated from US EPA. The Work Plan includes a budget spreadsheet, a short narrative summary of each selected project, and a copy of the selected project applications.
Appeal Process
An appeal process is available to applicants and other interested parties; however, appeals are limited to the Illinois EPA evaluation process. Evaluation scores may not be protested. An appeal must be submitted in writing to the following address: Illinois EPA, Attn: Section 604(b) Grant Program, Bureau of Water, Mail Code #15, P.O. Box 19276, Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276 and must be received within 14 calendar days after the date that the Notice of State Award has been published by the Illinois EPA on Grants.Illinois.gov. The written appeal shall include at a minimum the following: the name and address of the appealing party, identification of the grant, and a statement of reasons for the appeal. Illinois EPA shall acknowledge receipt of an appeal within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date the appeal was received.
When an appeal is received, the execution of all remaining grant agreements that Illinois EPA intends to make under this NOFO shall be stayed until the appeal is resolved, unless the Illinois EPA determines the needs of the State require moving forward with execution of the remaining grant agreements. The State need determination and rational shall be documented in writing.
Illinois EPA shall respond to the appeal within 60 days or supply a written explanation to the appealing party as to why additional time is required. The appealing party must supply any additional information requested by Illinois EPA within the time period set in the request. The Director of the Illinois EPA may appoint one or more Appeal Review Officers (ARO) to consider the grant-related appeal and make a recommendation to the Director of the Illinois EPA or designee for resolution. The ARO shall make a recommendation to the Director of the Illinois EPA or designee as expeditiously as possible after receiving all relevant, requested information. In determining the appropriate recommendation, the ARO shall consider the integrity of the competitive grant process and the impact of the recommendation on the Illinois EPA. The Illinois EPA shall resolve the appeal by means of written determination, which shall include, but not be limited to: review of the appeal, appeal determination, and rationale for the determination.
Anticipated Announcement Dates
By January 12, 2024, Illinois EPA expects to send written notice to each applicant whose application was not selected for inclusion in the Section 604(b) Grant Program Work Plan.
Following a decision of intent to award, the Illinois EPA is required by GATA to conduct a fiscal and administrative risk assessment and programmatic risk assessment of the applicant. Additional information may be required at that time from the successful applicant. To remain eligible for the award, the applicant must provide the requested information within the time specified by the Illinois EPA. The Fiscal and Administrative Risk Assessment Questionnaire is available on the GATA Portal.
By February 15, 2024, the Illinois EPA expects to send a Notice of State Award (NOSA) to the successful grant applicant for signature. The NOSA will specify the funding terms and specific conditions resulting from the pre-award risk assessments. The NOSA must be accepted and returned by an authorized representative of the grantee organization. The NOSA is not an authorization to begin performance or incur costs.
By April 15, 2024, Illinois EPA expects to send a grant agreement to the grant recipient for signature.
By June 1, 2024, Illinois EPA expects to provide a fully executed grant agreement to the grant recipient. A fully executed grant agreement is authorization for the grant recipient to begin work on the project.
| Action by Illinois EPA | Target Dates |
| Notify unsuccessful applicants that their application was not selected for inclusion in the Section 604(b) Grant Program Work Plan. | January 12, 2024 |
| Send a Notice of State Award to the selected applicant for signature. | February 15, 2024 |
| Send a Grant Agreement to the selected applicant for signature. | April 15, 2024 |
| Provide a fully executed Grant Agreement to the grantee. | June 1, 2024 |